transcendent boundary

The idea of the transcendent boundary is a solvent for the fact that we don't really form our understanding of the world based on perfect logic. So by being able to examine cross-categorical relations we should be able to deal with small logical systems that can be related to other small systems even though they may not be perfectly integrated. But there is another problem that my theory of the transcendent boundary system would tend to create. It would be pretty easy to build small systems that overlay an 'insightful' bounded system and these could even be integrated with other transcendent systems that were built to overlay other insightful bounded systems. So a well developed fantasy system could be created on top of related insightful systems using the methods that I have in mind. This problem does have a solution. These systems which overlay the insightful systems can be carefully examined to see if a viable method to tie these into some IO observations that are directly related to the insightful systems could be created. If a transcendent system is truly insightful, it should typically be useful in explaining and predicting some basic observations. Of course systems like this are not perfect and during the initial stages of learning the program might create some elaborate systems of nonsense. And an exhaustive search for inaccurate theories can interfere with learning since inaccuracies that do not play key roles for paradigms can act to support the weight of the paradigm while the 'student' is first learning. For instance, the good student will be aware that the fact that he does not fully understand the supporting structures (and transcendent relations) of a paradigm does not mean that he can use his ignorance to knock the theory down. Similarly, the fantasy that a system (like an axiomatic system) is sufficient to support an application of the system would not ruin that student's work with system unless he tried to apply it to a field where the naive application was not effective (like trying to use traditional logic to produce AGI). back to Jim Bromer Theory